The Leader page
Heathrow noise report revealed (Thursday 08/11/07)
» Send us your comments now
» More share your views
Please read our publishing policy
Aircraft noise from Heathrow continues to disrupt and annoy Hammersmith & Fulham residents. If my post bag is anything to go by, it’s one of the biggest bug bears for many of you.
Together with my counterparts in neighbouring boroughs, I have been working to get the results of a government survey on noise published. We have now succeeded and the survey shows that people become significantly annoyed at an average noise level of 50 decibels – compared to 57 decibels previously.
This report is an inconvenient truth for the government. They did not want it published in advance of the third runway announcement. It was only the pressure from local councils that forced their hand. This has taken six years of work and involved teams of international experts handpicked by the government. It must have cost at least £1 million of taxpayers' money yet still they say the findings are not robust.
The research was ordered by former transport minister Bob Ainsworth in 2001. He said at the time that the findings would 'underpin' government policy on aircraft noise.
The report's timing is crucial because the government is about to launch its campaign for a third runway at Heathrow. This can only go ahead if ministers are able to show that the expansion will not result in breaches to EU air quality limits and that there will be no increased exposure to noise in the area around the airport.
The area affected by the 57 decibel marker runs from Windsor to Barnes – a population of 258,000. But if the line is drawn at 50 decibels this takes in a much larger area running from Slough and Maidenhead to Clapham Common and Battersea. The area covers more than 2 million people including Hammersmith & Fulham residents.
But 'health warnings' attached to the report reveal that the government has no intention of allowing its findings to affect airports policy. Instead the Chief Economist concludes that while it is 'highly probable' that people's annoyance levels have increased since the early 1980s the study still needs 'further work'. Transport minister Jim Fitzpatrick said, "It does not give us the robust figures on which it would be safe to change policy."
The current annual movements limit at the airport is 480,000. If both runway alternations were ended and a third runway built the number of flights each year at Heathrow could rise to around 800,000. This is equivalent to building a new airport the size of Gatwick. The government has said it will publish the latest expansion plans at the end of December.
We will now be working with other boroughs to put the pressure on for a parliamentary investigation.
Residents of West London deserve a decent night’s sleep.
You can sign up to stop uncontrolled Heathrow expansion by clicking on: http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/stopheathrowexpansion/?e (opens new window).
Cllr Stephen Greenhalgh
---*---
H&F council welcome your feedback and input - you can reply to the Leader online via the H&F website. However, H&F council are unable to publish any material of an overtly political nature. Please make sure you read and understand the council's full online Publishing Policy before sharing your views.
---*---

