Councillors quiz health bosses over accident and emergency closure plans

Skip Navigation

Councillors quiz health bosses over accident and emergency closure plans

Thursday April 19, 2012

Health bosses confirmed (Tuesday, April 17) that a straight choice will be made between the closure of Charing Cross and Chelsea and Westminster A&E.

Councillors on Hammersmith & Fulham (H&F) Council’s Housing, Health And Adult Social Care Select Committee quizzed North West London NHS (NWL NHS) on an impending consultation on the future of local health services.

They said that one of the A&E units will close while confirming that Hammersmith Hospital is set to become a 'specialist' unit without A&E designation.

Out of the current nine major hospitals that cover the area, which includes H&F, Westminster, Kensington and Chelsea, Hillingdon, Harrow, Ealing and Brent, only five will continue with A&E units in a bid to save the local health service £1.8billion.

Dr Mark Spencer, NWL NHS Medical Director, claimed that the changes would consolidate medical expertise and services on major sites, leading to an improved service but that was seriously challenged by councillors.

Under the proposals that will go before the public shortly, the hospitals that do not retain A&Es will either be classed as ‘local hospitals’ with reduced services or, in the case of Hammersmith, likely to be given ‘specialist’ status.

A financial analysis is now being carried out which will determine whether Charing Cross or Chelsea and Westminster A&E is recommended for closure. They also said that if Charing Cross A&E is closed, it is likely that at least part of the site would be sold off. Only Northwick Park and Hillingdon are certain to retain ‘major hospital’ status because of their geographical locations.

Cllr Joe Carlebach, H&F Cabinet Member for Community Care, said that there is a real danger that that both Hammersmith Hospital and Charing Cross would lose the international research expertise for which they are renowned.

“With all due respect to Hillingdon and Northwick, they are unlikely to attract the world-class medical expertise that both our hospitals boast,” he said.

He also stated that NWL NHS had not factored in local traffic data in estimating longer ambulance journey times. H&F has the second most congested roads in London. Cllr Carlebach also raised the issue of how disabled people would get access to hospital services given that H&F Blue Badges are not accepted in neighbouring boroughs.

Councillors from both sides questioned whether it was really possible to save £1.8billion and improve health services at the same time.

Dr Spencer told councillors that they did not have enough surgeons to maintain the necessary round-the-clock expertise at nine major hospital sites and said that a major focus of work is improving out of hospital care to stop people being admitted in the first place. This will see the imminent launch of a ‘111’ number to signpost non-emergency care.

Councillors told NWL NHS that they wanted much more detail on what ‘the impact of the cuts’ will have on local residents. The issue will come back to the Select Committee in the coming months.

H&F Council Leader Cllr Stephen Greenhalgh has long highlighted what he calls the ‘systematic downgrading’ of Charing Cross over the years. Recently he said that removing A&E units from H&F makes ‘no sense’ when the borough has three nationally significant regeneration areas capable of creating 23,000 new homes and bringing 62,000 jobs.

Total A&E attendances in 2006/7 were 69,325 for Charing Cross and 30,795 for Hammersmith.

What do you think? Let us know below.

» Send us your comments now

The figure for attendances is from 2006/07 at both hospitals. Could we have some more up-to-date figures, please?
From Una Hodgkins on 26/06/2012 at 20:13
This is just another farce within the health service. Charing Cross is great because it has a walk in centre which frees up time for those PATIENTS that need real A&E services. Chelsea & westminster has childrens A&Eas well. The catchment area for both hospitals is vast so they should both stay. What they need to do is get rid of Managers, managing Mangers
that would make more sense.
From madtaz60 on 23/04/2012 at 13:29
I am in my nineties with a wife who has advanced Alzheimers and the Charing Cross A & E is the nearest we can get to medical assistance. Chopping it would be a disaster in our lives.
From Warburg on 20/04/2012 at 16:24
Charing Cross and Chelsea & Westminster jointly serve a huge population and whilst they might seem close, traffic congestion means accessibility from the extremes of their catchment area is poor most at most times. Charing Cross has only just had a major A&E upgrade and provides a first class service to walk-in patients; it would be almost criminal to close it.
From Anthony Williams on 20/04/2012 at 15:32
I totally agree with Lucy. It will not lead to an improved service. I know we have to trim costs but surely the money can be found by reducing the non essential areas of the NHS. I applaud the Council for taking a strident stance on this issue.
From Rob on 20/04/2012 at 14:24
I do not think that A&E departments at Charing Cross and Chelsea & Westminster are interchangeable. The amalgamation of Hammersmith with Charing Cross seems eminently sensible and should improve the cost basis for Charing Cross significantly.
Stay with Charing Cross!
From Bob Paterson on 20/04/2012 at 13:38
It is absolutely shocking that the A&E at Charing Cross Hospital may be closed. No-one will fall for this nonsense that it will lead to an "improved service" - it's farcical. I am glad that the Council is opposing this every step of the way and we should all be aiming to stop these dangerous plans which will cost lives and be to the detriment of people in all the NWL NHS boroughs.
From Lucy on 19/04/2012 at 10:35


Your comments

Display name:*
Enter the code shown above:*

                      I accept the terms and conditions of posting to this site*

* denotes mandatory field